<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worship Leading Essentials #15 &#8211; Band or Rotating Musicians?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reson8.org/2007/worship-leading-essentials-15-band-or-rotating-musicians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reson8.org/2007/worship-leading-essentials-15-band-or-rotating-musicians/</link>
	<description>living a life in resonance with God</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 06:46:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://reson8.org/2007/worship-leading-essentials-15-band-or-rotating-musicians/comment-page-1/#comment-1103</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reson8.org/2007/worship-leading-essentials-15-band-or-rotating-musicians/#comment-1103</guid>
		<description>You didn&#039;t really comment on why you use a pool rather than multiple bands.  Is it ok if I comment on our church&#039;s experience?

We started with one band, then started rotating in and out, and finally went to a multiple band format.  For us, this seems to be the best of both options.  You get time away from leading, you get the musical consistency and team-building of playing with a common group, and you have more available spots for alternate vocalists or musicians to plug in when there is a schedule conflict or just for the sake of rotating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You didn&#8217;t really comment on why you use a pool rather than multiple bands.  Is it ok if I comment on our church&#8217;s experience?</p>
<p>We started with one band, then started rotating in and out, and finally went to a multiple band format.  For us, this seems to be the best of both options.  You get time away from leading, you get the musical consistency and team-building of playing with a common group, and you have more available spots for alternate vocalists or musicians to plug in when there is a schedule conflict or just for the sake of rotating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: resonate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Worship Leading Essentials</title>
		<link>http://reson8.org/2007/worship-leading-essentials-15-band-or-rotating-musicians/comment-page-1/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>resonate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Worship Leading Essentials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reson8.org/2007/worship-leading-essentials-15-band-or-rotating-musicians/#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>[...] Band or Rotating Musicians? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Band or Rotating Musicians? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.782 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-01-07 11:15:22 -->
